Movie Transformers 4

Transformers 4: Age of Extinction Plot. The film begins after an epic battle that left a great city torn, but with the world saved. As humanity picks up the pieces, a shadowy group reveals itself in an attempt to control the direction of history while an ancient, powerful new menace sets Earth in its crosshairs.

I am 36 years old and I grew up watching Transformers the cartoon and playing with the toys in the 80's. The franchise had achieved mind share. The plan worked. The first and second live action movie didn't do much for me. The one I enjoyed the most and actually felt something for was Dark of the Moon. Until Age of Extinction.

I really enjoyed it. Yes it completely objectifies women and is racist and sticks adverts and bright shiny things in your face but hey, thats life (What are YOU doing to stop this? Writing a negative review of Transformers? Good for you, that will fix the Human Race), and this is an allegory to life created by a conglomerative passionate effort of differing perspectives, some corporate, some childish. The racist and sexist elements especially of Age of Extinction could be an opportunity to communicate to children about right and wrong and the way women (and men to a much lesser extreme) are portrayed as objects in our world.

RGC MAPHACK DotA Allstars 6.88w9.4 Add me to Telegram @miserydie Add me to Discord #4299 Add me to Skype RelaxInBlack D3scene.ru - Misery D3scene.com - FunnyNooB. Map hack dota 1 2018. Dota 2 Hack Tutorial (Zoom Hack/Map Hack/Undetected) 2018. 100% working and tested on all devices. Human Verification Before generating Dragon Claw Hook, Ionic Vapor and Midas Gold, you need to confirm you are not a robot. For Purchase, Contact me: Discord: NoA#8448 Skype: noa4ever25 Or contact me via d3scene: RGC Undetected MapHack Dota.

Communication is what we seem to give up on these days. Transformers is a franchise but it is also human history. It is some peoples (mainly boys) memories of childhood. And the movie is a live action perspective of this.

Transformers aided in the development of self. When i think back now the cartoon instilled in me ideals of morality, honour, friendship, teamwork, valuing different forms of life, and the endless, timeless, continuous, ever repeating battle of good versus evil, positive and negative in the form of Autobots and Decepticons. Messages abound in the film about spite and contempt for life and human brutality and dishonour, racism against man and machine or a perceived lesser form of life, sexism, objectification of women.

Standardised beauty in the form of the beautiful men and women and cars, the 'objects' created by minds that have been programmed by our societies models of beauty. A lot of reviewers seem to have irrational hatred for Michael Bay and Transformers and their reviews are purposely negative and unbalanced, and to create balance they create irrational defence of the creative work by others.

Can you not see this people?! The negative reviews are all filled with the same old criticisms that all the prior movies have gotten, they never really review the film, they run out of things to say fast and start to go through and pick apart the plot and just talk about the stupid or dumb elements. This movie was no 'dumber' than Avatar. (Unobtainium anyone?) But what I dislike the most is the looking down on people with contempt for enjoying the film. The passion in these negatives seems to be for mocking other peoples passion. Or Transformers of all things represents everything they hate in the world.

It would be funny if it wasn't true though, It is a waste of energy you negative multiplying reviewers, find some purpose! We are additive and subtractive beings, positive and negative, but it is the absolutes that are pointless and insignificant but entirely significant and to the point. It is the nature of absolutes.

Don't you get it. Anyway back to the movie. Easier to follow action and plot.

Beautifully awesome special effects. But the key is Optimus Prime, the best of the best, willing to protect lesser forms of life (the humans) and more to the point the human sensory representation of Optimus Prime - the voice of Peter Cullen - You are a Legend. Transformers: Age of Extinction 7 out of 10 By Striker Eureka.

Love him or hate him (or love to hate him), Michael Bay is a this-knob-goes-to-11 kind of director. He has never subscribed to the philosophy of “always leave them wanting more” — and, judging by his box office record, at least, it’s hard to argue with the results. But in the case of Bay’s latest, “Transformers: Age of Extinction,” if the largely scathing reviews are any indication, many who see the movie this weekend may be left wanting a little less.With each successive installment in the “Transformers” franchise, the running time has grown longer. The first “Transformers” film came in at a relatively svelte 2 hours, 24 minutes; the second ran 2 hours, 30 minutes; the third was 2 hours, 37 minutes. And the fourth? It tips the scales at a whopping 2 hours, 45 minutes. That’s 165 minutes of cars turning into giant robots and making smashy smashy.It’s not uncommon for some bloat to creep into ongoing franchises, as directors feel both emboldened by their success and pressured to top themselves.

The first film in Peter Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” trilogy ran 2 hours, 58 minutes, but by the third trek through Middle-earth, that run-time was up to 3 hours, 21 minutes. Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy went from 2 hours, 21 minutes for “Batman Begins” to 2 hours, 45 minutes for “The Dark Knight Returns.”But while many critics and moviegoers felt those films earned their lengths with a certain thematic heft, it’s fair to ask whether any movie based on a line of toys really needs to be nearly three hours long. To put things in perspective, the original cut of “Apocalypse Now” was just 2 hours, 33 minutes long — and there Francis Ford Coppola was taking on the Vietnam War, not the war between the Autobots and Decepticons. But in today’s Hollywood, it’s the Jacksons, Nolans and Bays who are swinging for the fences with the kind of long cinematic epics that used to be the province of filmmakers like Coppola, David Lean, and Akira Kurosawa. One might wonder why you’d even want to make such a long movie in the first place if your primary target audience is attention-span-challenged 10-to-15-year-old boys.

But the fact is, there are more than aesthetic considerations at play here. By releasing the fourth “Transformers” film at 165 minutes, Paramount Pictures is potentially cutting into its own grosses. It’s simple math: the longer the movie, the fewer the times it can be shown in any given theater.Make no mistake: “Transformers: Age of Extinction” will earn vast amounts of money in its opening weekend, and Bay will likely brush off the negative reviews, as he always does. “They castrate me,” he once said of critics.

“They think I’m the devil.” (For the record, Times critic Betsy Sharkey found.) But if the film comes in at significantly below the $100-million benchmark many have set for its opening, some observers will inevitably be asking on Monday whether Bay should have reined things in just a bit. After all, the Transformers are already “more than meets the eye.” Isn’t that enough?Follow for more movie news.